Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.20 seconds)
By This Order The Application Filed By ... vs Unknown on 1 October, 2012 cites

M/S. Mandvi Co-Op Bank Ltd vs Nimesh B.Thakore on 11 January, 2010

7. As regards the first point, a lot emphasis has been lead by Sh. Prem Kumar, Ld. Advocate for the complainant/respondent that in view of the decision in Mandvi Co­op Bank Ltd. v Nimesh B. Thakore the accused cannot lead evidence beyond the defence he takes in his examination u/s 313 of Cr.P.C. He mainly emphasized on para 16 of the said decision of the Supreme Court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 33 - Cited by 437 - A Alam - Full Document

Kadir Mohideen Sahib vs Emperor on 11 February, 1935

intends to call or what evidence he will give or what his defence is. (Queen­ Empress v Hargobind Singh (1832) ILR 14 ALL 242, Mohideen Abdul Kadir v Emperor (1904) ILR 27 Mad 238, Queen­Empress v R. Hawthorne (1891) ILR 13 All 3451, Gaya Singh v Mohammad Soliman (1901) 5 CWN 864 and King­ Emperor v Bhut Nath Ghose (1903) 7 CWN 345: See Sohoni's Code of Criminal Procedure, Volume 4, 20th Edition, page 1431)
Madras High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 11 - Full Document
1