Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.22 seconds)
Chettinad International Coal Terminal vs Kamarajar Port Limited cites

State Of Rajasthan vs M/S Nav Bharat Construction Company on 4 October, 2005

13. It is well settled that when a case involves interpretation of a clause or some clauses of an agreement and the Arbitral Tribunal gives an interpretation which is plausible, the Court would not substitute that interpretation for its own interpretation only because the Court takes a different view or feels that the other interpretation is a better interpretation. This view is fortified by the decisions of the Supreme Court in State of Rajasthan v. Nav Bharat Construction Co., reported in (2010) 2 SCC 182 and P.R.Shah, supra.
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 106 - S N Variava - Full Document

Food Corporation Of India vs M/S.Chandu Construction & Anr on 10 April, 2007

20. That apart, the law is also settled as referred to hereinearlier that the jurisdiction of the court under Section 30 of the Act is not appellate in nature and the award passed by the umpire cannot be set aside on the ground that it was erroneous. It is also not open to the court to interfere with the award merely because in the opinion of the court, another view is equally possible. Keeping in view these principles as laid down by this Court in the aforesaid two decisions, let us now consider the award passed by the umpire in respect of the claims of the respondent excluding Claims 2 and 26. (to be noted, this case law was relied on by Appellant also and Appellant highlighted paragraph 19. This has been captured in paragraph 7(k)(vi).
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 94 - D K Jain - Full Document
1