Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.30 seconds)
G. Srinivasa Rao, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 6 November, 2024 cites

Commissioner Of Central Excise,Bolpur vs M/S.Ratan Melting & Wire Industries on 14 October, 2008

32. On a reference made by a Bench of Three Judges of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in Commissioner of Central Excise v. Ratan Melting And Wire Industries, Calcutta8, a Constitutional Bench in CCE v. Ratan 8 (2005) 3 SCC 57 20 Melting & Wire Industries9, held that: "The circulars and instructions issued by the Board are no doubt binding in law on the authorities under the respective statutes, but when the Supreme Court or the High Court declares the law on the question arising for consideration, it would not be appropriate for the Court to direct that the circular should be given effect and not the view expressed in a decision of this Court or the High Court. So far as the clarifications/circulars issued by the Central Government and of the State Government are concerned they respect merely their understanding of the statutory provisions."
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 145 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Chairman And Managing Director,United ... vs P.C.Kakkar Chairman And Managing ... on 11 February, 2003

24. Learned counsel for the 6th respondent relied on judgment of the Hon‟ble Apex Court in Chairman & Managing Director, United Commercial Bank v. P.C.Kakkar7, for the proposition that a bank is dependent upon each of its officers and officers acting and operating within their allotted sphere and acting beyond one‟s authority is by itself a breach of discipline and is a misconduct. Hence, prayed to dismiss the Writ Petitions.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 428 - A Pasayat - Full Document

S. Balappa vs Co-Operative Tribunal And Ors. on 28 January, 2005

(4) S.Balappa v. Co-operative Tribunal, Hyderabad and others4, for the proposition that to bring a case within the scope of Section 60, it should appear that any person who has taken part in the management of the society or any past or present officer of the society has misappropriated or fraudulently retained any money or other property or has been guilty of breach of trust in relation to the society and it must also appear in the course of the audit or enquiry or in an inspection or on the winding up of a society, the said amount had fallen due to be recovered from the concerned person.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 6 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

L.N.Peta Primary Agricultural ... vs The Government Of Andhra Pradesh, ... on 13 October, 2014

(1) L.N.Peta Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Cooperative Societies Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and others5, for the proposition that the Court in exercise of discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India shall not prevent an inquiry intended to be held for unearthing fraud, if any, allegedly committed in disbursement of pubic money and the same cannot be allowed to be kept based on technicalities.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - C V Reddy - Full Document
1