Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.22 seconds)

Kunal Kumar Tiwari @ Kunal Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 21 August, 2017

5. Apart from conditions (a) to (c) in Section 437(3) of the CrPC, there is a power to impose additional conditions “in the interest of justice”. The scope of the concept of “interest of justice” in Section 437(3) of the CrPC has been considered by this Court in the case of Kunal Kumar Tiwari v. State of Bihar2. In paragraph 9, this Court held thus:
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 13 - Cited by 30 - Full Document

Tofan Singh vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 29 October, 2020

13. Coming to the facts of the case, bail has been granted to the appellant firstly on the ground that the appellant has been implicated based on statements recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act, and that such statements are entirely inadmissible in view of the decision of this Court in the case of Criminal Appeal @ SLP (Crl) No.6339­40 of 2023 Page 23 of 25 Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu 5. So, bail has been granted on merits as well. Secondly, the bail has also been granted relying upon what is held in paragraph 15 of the decision in the case of Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee1. As the bail was granted on merits by relying upon the decision of this Court in the case of Tofan Singh2, there was no reason for the High Court to have imposed all the onerous conditions incorporated in paragraph 15 of the decision in the case of Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee1.
Supreme Court of India Cites 360 - Cited by 1439 - R F Nariman - Full Document
1