Rangappa vs Sri Mohan on 7 May, 2010
In this respect a three Judges bench of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rangappa Vs. S. Mohan decided on
07.05.2010 has held that:
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.28 seconds)
It Will Be Apt To Quote Hon'Ble Supreme ... vs Nimesh B Thakore, (2010) 3 Scc 83: on 7 March, 2011
cites
M/S. Mandvi Co-Op Bank Ltd vs Nimesh B.Thakore on 11 January, 2010
In this respect
it will be apt to quote Hon'ble Supreme Court in M/s Mandvi Co-op Bank Ltd vs Nimesh B thakore, (2010) 3 SCC 83:
C.C. Alavi Haji vs Palapetty Muhammed & Anr on 18 May, 2007
In this respect
it will be apt to quote Hon'ble Supreme Court in C.C. Alavi Haji v. Palapetty Muhammed and Another (2007) 6 SCC
555:
V.S.Yadav vs Reena on 21 September, 2010
8. Complainant has relied upon a decision in case titled V S Yadav vs Reena 2010(4) JCC (NI) 323 to contend that
a mere explanation given in the examination recorded under Section-313 is not sufficient. Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in
the said judgment has observed that:
Kamala S vs Vidyadharan M.J. & Anr on 20 February, 2007
8.1. Against this, the accused has relied upon a decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Kamala S vs Vidyadharan
M.J. & Anr Appeal (crl.) 233 of 2007, decided on 20.02.2007
"15. The Act contains provisions raising presumption as regards the negotiable
instruments under Section 118(a) of the Act as also under Section 139 thereof. The
said presumptions are rebuttable ones. Whether presumption stood rebutted or not
would depend upon the facts and circumstances of each case.
M.S. Narayana Menon @ Mani vs State Of Kerala & Anr on 4 July, 2006
16. The nature and extent of such presumption came up for consideration before
this Court in M.S. Narayana Menon Alias Mani V. State of Kerala and
Anr. [(2006) 6 SCC 39] wherein it was held :
Hiten P. Dalal vs Bratindranath Banerjee on 11 July, 2001
In this respect Hon'ble Supreme Court in
Hiten P. Dalal v. Bratindranath Banerjee, (2001) 6 SCC 16 has observed that:
1