Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.16 seconds)

Roop Chand & Anr. Etc. vs State Of Haryana . on 4 April, 2014

In "Roop Chand Vs. The State of Haryana 1999 (1) C.L.R, the Punjab and Haryana High Court held as under:­ "3. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and gone through the evidence with their help. The recovery of illicit liquor was effected from the possession of the petitioner during noon time and it is in the evidence of the prosecution witnesses that some witnesses from the public were available and they were asked to join the investigation. The explanation furnished by the prosecution is that the independent witnesses were asked to join the investigation but they refused to do so on the ground that their joining will result into enmity between them and the petitioner".
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 1437 - Full Document
1