Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.19 seconds)

Mallappa S/O Late Bassappa, vs Union Of India By General Manager South ... on 11 December, 2015

6. Learned counsel for the claimants contended that the death of the deceased in a railway station is not in dispute. He contended that the incident did not fall within the definition of Section 123(c) (2) of the Act, 1989. He relied upon the judgments of the Apex Court in the cases of Union of India Vs. Prabhakaran Vijayakumar and -5- NC: 2023:KHC-K:5005 MFA No. 201299 of 2019 Others1, Jameela and others Vs. Union of India2 and Union of India Vs. Mangalabai and others3 and unreported judgments of this Court in the cases of Mallappa and another Vs. Union of India4 and Smt. Surekha and Others Vs. Union of India5. He therefore, prays that the impugned order passed by the Tribunal be set aside and appropriate compensation be awarded.
Karnataka High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - G Narendar - Full Document

The New India Assurance Co Ltd, vs Mangalabai And Another on 3 January, 2011

6. Learned counsel for the claimants contended that the death of the deceased in a railway station is not in dispute. He contended that the incident did not fall within the definition of Section 123(c) (2) of the Act, 1989. He relied upon the judgments of the Apex Court in the cases of Union of India Vs. Prabhakaran Vijayakumar and -5- NC: 2023:KHC-K:5005 MFA No. 201299 of 2019 Others1, Jameela and others Vs. Union of India2 and Union of India Vs. Mangalabai and others3 and unreported judgments of this Court in the cases of Mallappa and another Vs. Union of India4 and Smt. Surekha and Others Vs. Union of India5. He therefore, prays that the impugned order passed by the Tribunal be set aside and appropriate compensation be awarded.
Karnataka High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - H S Kempanna - Full Document
1   2 Next