Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.71 seconds)Section 304 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 498 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Kishan Lal vs Dharmendra Bafna & Anr on 21 July, 2009
In Kishan Lal Vs. Dharmendra Bafna and another reported in (2009) 7 SCC 685,
wherein, the Apex Court has held as follows:
Divine Retreat Centre vs State Of Kerala & Ors on 11 March, 2008
In Divine Retreat Centre Vs. State of Kerala and others reported in (2008) 3 SCC
542, the Apex Court has held as follows:
Sakiri Vasu vs State Of U.P. And Others on 7 December, 2007
In Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others reported in (2008)2 SCC
Page 409, the Apex Court has held as follows:
Secretary, Minor Irrigation & Rural ... vs Sahngoo Ram Arya And Anr. on 7 May, 2002
In Secy., Minor Irrigation & Rural Engg. Services, U.P. v. Sahngoo
Ram Arya1 (SCC vide para 6) this Court observed that although the High Court has
power to order a CBI inquiry, that power should only be exercised if the High
Court after considering the material on record comes to a conclusion that such
material discloses prima facie a case calling for investigation by CBI or by any
other similar agency. A CBI inquiry cannot be ordered as a matter of routine or
merely because the party makes some allegation.
Hasan Ammal vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep. By on 3 June, 2009
"Para 20. On a careful consideration of the submissions made by both the
parties and the dicta laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the aforesaid
judgments, the investigation and detection of crime, which is a domain of
executives and the Investigating Agency need not be interfered by the judiciary
without any finding of mala fide on the part of such agencies. Moreover, it is
also laid down that the transfer of investigation can be done by the High Court
only under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in rare and exceptional
cases."