Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (1.25 seconds)Section 17 in The Recovery Of Debts Due To Banks And Financial Institutions Act, 1993 [Entire Act]
Section 20 in The Recovery Of Debts Due To Banks And Financial Institutions Act, 1993 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Glenny, C.J. vs The Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd. on 27 March, 2003
4. We have carefully gone through the decision in Glenny's case 2003 (2) KLT 973 and with great respect it has to be held that the question that arose for consideration in the said case is entirely different from the point that arises for consideration in the present case. Even though there is a casual observation made in the said judgment that an appeal against a decree for an amount exceeding Rs. 10 lakhs would lie before the Appellate Tribunal, it has to be considered that the question as such did not squarely come up for consideration before the Full Bench and as such the observation is only an obiter and cannot be taken as a ratio decedenti. However, in order to answer the question that is referred to us, it is necessary to consider the other contentions raised by the parties.
Mukund Deo (Dead) Represented By His ... vs Mahadu And Ors. on 31 August, 1964
6. The above position has been reiterated by the Apex Court in Kasibai v. Mahadu in the following lines:
Section 22 in The Recovery Of Debts Due To Banks And Financial Institutions Act, 1993 [Entire Act]
Section 30 in The Recovery Of Debts Due To Banks And Financial Institutions Act, 1993 [Entire Act]
Cochin Malabar Estates & Industries vs State Of Kerala on 2 November, 2001
Placing reliance on the decision in Cochin Malabar Estate & Industries v. State of Kerala 2002 (1) KLT 588, it was contended before the Division Bench that the Division Bench is bound by the Full Bench decision in Glenny's case 2003 (2) KLT 973.
1