Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (1.31 seconds)Section 15 in The Court-fees Act, 1870 [Entire Act]
The Court-fees Act, 1870
Section 5 in The Court-fees Act, 1870 [Entire Act]
Section 14 in The Court-fees Act, 1870 [Entire Act]
Indu Bhusan Roy Choudhury vs Secy. Of State on 16 July, 1935
In the decisions reported in AIR 1936 Cal 347 (Kumud Nath Das v. Govt. Pleader); AIR 1943 Bom 50 (Ahmed Ebrahim Vorajee v. Govt. of the Province of Bombay); AIR 1950 Bom 4 (Vishnuprasad Na-randas v. Narandas Mohanlal); AIR 1935 Cal 707 (Indu Bhusan Roy v. Secy, of State); AIR 1933 Oudh 170 (1) (Mohammad Sadiq Ali Khan v. Ali Abbas) and AIR 1939 Lah 257 (Firm Hari Ram and Sons v. H. O. Hay) the Courts by exercising their inherent power under Section 151. Civil Procedure Code ordered refund of the court-fee paid in those cases.
Eagle Plywood Industries Private Ltd. vs Amulya Gopal Majumdar And Ors. on 4 June, 1965
In the Full Bench decision reported in AIR 1966 Cal 267 (Eagle Plywood Industries (P) Ltd. v. Amulya Gopal) it has, amongst other things, been held in paragraph 8 thereof that where the matters are within the scope of Sections 13 to 15 of the Court Fees Act, the provisions of those sections must be strictly applied, and in matters out of the scope of those sections the court has in certain circumstances inherent jurisdiction to order refund of court-fee on the principle that every court has inherent power to do real and substantial justice for the administration of which it exists.
Ahmed Ebrahim Vorajee vs The Government Of The Province Of Bombay on 17 March, 1942
In the decisions reported in AIR 1936 Cal 347 (Kumud Nath Das v. Govt. Pleader); AIR 1943 Bom 50 (Ahmed Ebrahim Vorajee v. Govt. of the Province of Bombay); AIR 1950 Bom 4 (Vishnuprasad Na-randas v. Narandas Mohanlal); AIR 1935 Cal 707 (Indu Bhusan Roy v. Secy, of State); AIR 1933 Oudh 170 (1) (Mohammad Sadiq Ali Khan v. Ali Abbas) and AIR 1939 Lah 257 (Firm Hari Ram and Sons v. H. O. Hay) the Courts by exercising their inherent power under Section 151. Civil Procedure Code ordered refund of the court-fee paid in those cases.
Munna Lal And Anr. vs Abir Chand on 19 March, 1958
The appellant thereafter filed an application for the refund of the court-fee paid on the memorandum of the said appeal, and that matter was referred to a Full Bench of that court, which rejected the said prayer on the ground that the amount of court-fee in that case was paid properly and intentionally as the appeal otherwise would not have been entertained at all. On these facts they did not exercise their inherent power to grant the said prayer. Thus the facts and premises in which the said decision was arrived at are entirely different from those in the present case before us and so the same is not an apt citation for this case.