Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.52 seconds)Arulmighu Lakshmi Narayanaswamy ... vs Nallammal (Dead) Thr. Lrs. & Ors on 15 September, 2011
(iii) Arulmighu Lakshmi Narayanaswamy Temple v. Nallammal reported in
2011 (5) CTC 569. Paragraph 13 reads thus:
Palaniappa Pandaram And Ors. vs The Special Commissioner And ... on 31 July, 1995
A.A. Gopalakrishnan vs Cochin Devaswom Board & Ors on 19 July, 2007
(ii) A.A.Gopalakrishnan v. Cochin Devaswom Board reported in AIR 2007
SUPREME COURT 3162. Paragraph 10 is reproduced hereunder:
"10. The properties of deities, temples and Devaswom Boards, require to
be protected and safeguarded by their Trustees/Archaks/Sebaits/employees.
Instances are many where persons entrusted with the duty of managing and
safeguarding the properties of temples, deities and Devaswom Boards have
usurped and misappropriated such properties by setting up false claims of
ownership or tenancy, or adverse possession. This is possible only with the
passive or active collusion of the concerned authorities. Such acts of
'fences eating the crops' should be dealt with sternly. The Government,
members or trustees of Boards/Trusts, and devotees should be vigilant to
prevent any such usurpation or encroachment. It is also the duty of courts to
protect and safeguard the properties of religious and charitable institutions
from wrongful claims or misappropriation."
Section 46 in Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997 [Entire Act]
Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997
R.Natesan vs The District Collector on 4 August, 2014
(iii) R.Natesan v. The District Collector and others [W.P.(MD)No.9060
of 2014, etc. batch, decided on 04.08.2014]. Paragraph 20 is extracted below:
1