Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 28 (0.86 seconds)Section 20 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 16 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 20 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 28 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 22 in The Specific Relief Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Anil Verman vs M/S. Raheja Developers Pvt. Ltd. on 23 February, 1999
21. The three judgments referred to by learned Counsel for the defendants of this Court in Sheela Agarwal case (supra); M/s. Uttam International case (supra) & Anil Verman case (supra) propounded the legal position that even where relief of possession is not prayed for in a suit for specific performance the said relief is intrinsic to the relief for specific performance and thus if the plaintiff is not in possession of the suit property and seeks specific performance the suit can be filed only within the jurisdiction of the Court where the property is situated.
Adcon Electronics Pvt. Ltd vs Daulat And Anr on 12 September, 2001
The distinction made in Adcon Electronics Pvt. Ltd. case (supra) in respect of a suit for specific performance simpliciter and a suit where possession of property is also claimed is not subject matter of adjudication in the present case.
The Delhi And London Bank vs Wordie And Ors. on 2 May, 1876
The High Court also referred to the view of the Calcutta High Court in The Delhi and London Bank v. Wordie I.L.R., 1 Calcutta 249 at p.263 construing that expression to mean, substantially for land -- that is for the purpose of acquiring title to, or control over, land.