Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.21 seconds)
Atma S. Berar vs Mukhtiar Singh on 12 December, 2002 cites

Shiv Sarup Gupta vs Dr. Mahesh Chand Gupta on 30 July, 1999

In Shiv Sarup Gupta Vs. Dr. Mahesh Chand Gupta (1999) 6 SCC 222 this Court made a comparative study of the provisions contained in section 115 CPC in juxtaposition with Section 25-B(8) of Delhi Act and held that the High Court cannot appreciate or reappreciate evidence dictated by its mere inclination to take a different view of the facts as if it were a court of facts. A conclusion arrived at which is wholly unreasonable or is one that no reasonable person acting with objectivity could have reached on the material available, ignoring the weight of evidence, proceeding on a wrong premise of law or deriving such conclusions from the established facts as betray a lack of reason and/or objectivity would render the finding 'not according to law' calling for an interference under Section 25-B(8) proviso by the High Court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 974 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

Gulabbai vs Nalin Narsi Vohra And Ors on 15 July, 1991

In Gulabbai Vs. Nalin Narsi Vohra & Ors., (1991) 3 SCC 483, reiterating the view taken in Bega Begum Vs. Abdul Ahad Khan, (1979) 1 SCC 273, it was held that the words "reasonable requirement" undoubtedly postulate that there must be an element of need as opposed to a mere desire or wish. The distinction between desire and need should doubtless be kept in mind but not so as to make even the genuine need as nothing but a desire.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 42 - B C Ray - Full Document

Bega Begum And Ors vs Abdul Ahad Khan And Ors on 6 October, 1978

In Gulabbai Vs. Nalin Narsi Vohra & Ors., (1991) 3 SCC 483, reiterating the view taken in Bega Begum Vs. Abdul Ahad Khan, (1979) 1 SCC 273, it was held that the words "reasonable requirement" undoubtedly postulate that there must be an element of need as opposed to a mere desire or wish. The distinction between desire and need should doubtless be kept in mind but not so as to make even the genuine need as nothing but a desire.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 200 - S M Ali - Full Document
1