Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.75 seconds)

National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Pranay Sethi on 31 October, 2017

The controversy in regard to the principle of addition of actual income towards future prospects was referred to the larger bench of the Hon'ble Apex Court, for authoritative pronouncement in the case of National Insurance Company vs. Pranay Sethi (2017) SCC online SC 1270. After appreciating the entire factual scenario, in the light of prescribed provisions of law, the Honourable Apex Court delineated the guidelines that in case the deceased was self-employed or on a fixed salary and he was below 40 years of age, there should be addition of 40 % of his established income towards future prospects and in case deceased was in between 40 to 50 years, addition of 25% of the established income would be reasonable.
Supreme Court of India Cites 32 - Cited by 9815 - D Misra - Full Document

National Insurance Company Ltd vs Pranay Sethi Son Of Late Prashant Sethi ... on 20 April, 2011

The calculation of compensation amount towards non-pecuniary heads appears to be against the well-settled principles of law as laid down in Pranay Sethi's case (supra). Therefore, it should be considered that the appellants/claimants are entitled for further enhancement of compensation by applying multiplier of 15, as well as addition of amount towards future prospects and requisite amount of compensation towards non-pecuniary heads.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 10133 - K Kannan - Full Document
1