Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 29 (0.24 seconds)Article 31C in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Right To Fair Compensation And Transparency In Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Nagpur Improvement Trust And Another vs Vithal Rao And Others on 11 December, 1972
"31.Nagpur Improvement Trust [Nagpur Improvement
Page 10 of 16
Uploaded by EZHURHASSAN SUDHIR ACHUTHAN(HC00192) on Tue Jul 08 2025 Downloaded on : Fri Jul 11 22:33:30 IST 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/2142/2014 ORDER DATED: 30/06/2025
undefined
Trust v. Vithal Rao, (1973) 1 SCC 500] has clearly held
that ordinarily a classification based on public purpose
is not permissible under Article 14 for the purpose of
determining compensation. Also, in para 30, the seven-
Judge Bench unequivocally states that it is immaterial
whether it is one Acquisition Act or another
Acquisition Act under which the land is acquired, as, if
the existence of these two Acts would enable the State
to give one owner different treatment from another
who is similarly situated, Article 14 would be
infracted. In the facts of these cases, it is clear that
from the point of view of the landowner it is
immaterial that his land is acquired under the National
Highways Act and not the Land Acquisition Act, as
solatium cannot be denied on account of this fact
alone."
Section 105 in The Right To Fair Compensation And Transparency In Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 [Entire Act]
Section 3J in The National Highways Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Union Of India vs Tarsem Singh on 19 September, 2019
In this view of the
matter, we are of the view that the view of the Punjab and
Haryana High Court [Union of India v. Tarsem Singh,
2018 SCC OnLine P&H 6036] , [Jang Bahadur v. Union of
India, 2018 SCC OnLine P&H 6034] , [Union of India v.