Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.35 seconds)United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Bharamappa Doddabirappa Pujari And ... on 18 July, 2003
50. At this stage, I have gone through a citation relied by
the counsel for the petitioners reported in ILR 2003 KAR 3511
(United India Ins.Co.Ltd., Vs. Bharamappa Doddabirappa Pujari
and another), wherein, the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka
observed in para No.20 of the Judgment as under:
Bhakra Beas Management Board vs Kanta Aggarwal & Ors on 7 July, 2008
42. At this stage, I have gone through the Judgment
passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal
No.4216/2008 dt.7-7-2008 arising out of SLP(C)
No.21953/2004) (Bhakra Beas Management Board Vs. Smt.Kanta
Aggarwal and others) relied by the counsel for the respondent
No.2. On going through the said Judgment, the Hon'ble Apex
court observed in para No.33 of the Judgment as under:
Mrs. Helen C. Rebello & Ors vs Maharashtra State Road Transport ... on 18 September, 1998
44. Further at this stage, I come across a citation of our
Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in AIR 1998 SC 3191 (Helen
C.Rebello and others Vs. Maharasthra State Road Transport
Corporation and another), wherein, the Hon'ble Apex Court
observed in last para of the Judgment as under:
Section 166 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Reliance General Insurance Comp. Ltd vs Shashi Sharma & Ors on 23 September, 2016
2. Civil Appeal No.9654/2016 dt.23-9-2016 (Reliance
Gen.Ins.Co.Ltd., Vs. Shashi Sharma and others)
Kumari Kiran Thr. Her Father ... vs Sajjan Singh & Ors on 11 September, 2014
3.(2015) I SCC 539 (Kumari Kdiran Vs. Sajjan Singh and
others)
Munna Lal Jain & Anr vs Vipin Kumar Sharma & Ors on 15 May, 2015
35. Further as stated above that, deceased Rohith
D'Souza was a permanent employee and aged about 30 years as
on the date of accident. Hence, in view of the observation of the
Hon'ble apex court in a citation reported in 2015 AIR SCW 3105
(Munna Lal Jain and another Vs. Vipin Kumar sharma and others),
if 50% of the income is to be added to the income of deceased
as future prospects, on such addition, the total income of the
deceased comes to Rs.8,35,500/-P.A. and the same is considered
as income of the deceased certainly it would meet the ends of
justice.
Vimal Kanwar & Ors vs Kishore Dan & Ors on 3 May, 2013
43. On the other hand, at this stage, I have gone through
the citation relied by the counsel for the petitioners reported in
2013 AIR SCW 3258 (Vimal Kanwar and others Vs. Kishore Dan
and others), wherein, at para No.19 of the Judgment, the Hon'ble
supreme court observed as under: