Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.37 seconds)

Exemption) Yamini Manohar vs T K D Keerthi on 21 April, 2023

5. Having regard to the facts of the present case wherein urgent relief is prayed for and in light of the judgment of Supreme Court in Yamini Manohar v. T.K.D. Keerthi, (2024) 5 SCC 815, as also Division Bench of this Court in Chandra Kishore Chaurasia v. RA Perfumery Works Private Ltd., 2022 SCC OnLine Del 3529, exemption is granted to the Plaintiff from Pre-Institution Mediation.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 7 - A Bansal - Full Document

Chandra Kishore Chaurasia vs R A Perfumery Works Private Limited on 25 August, 2021

5. Having regard to the facts of the present case wherein urgent relief is prayed for and in light of the judgment of Supreme Court in Yamini Manohar v. T.K.D. Keerthi, (2024) 5 SCC 815, as also Division Bench of this Court in Chandra Kishore Chaurasia v. RA Perfumery Works Private Ltd., 2022 SCC OnLine Del 3529, exemption is granted to the Plaintiff from Pre-Institution Mediation.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 198 - Manmohan - Full Document

Anil Kapoor vs Simply Life India & Ors on 20 September, 2023

46. Plaintiff has a right to protect his name, likeness, voice and image, which are the elements and attributes of his persona and personality and no third party has a right to use these attributes without his authorisation. It is equally settled that when attributes of famous personalities are unauthorisedly used, it leads to commercial detriment. Celebrity's right of endorsement acts as a major source of likelihood which cannot be destroyed by permitting unlawful dissemination and sale of merchandise or other articles bearing the face or attributes of his or her persona without authorisation. [Ref.: Anil Kapoor v. Simply Life India, 2023 SCC Online Del 6914 and Jaikishan Kakubhai Saraf v. Peppy Store and Others, 2024 SCC OnLine Del 3664].
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - P M Singh - Full Document
1