Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 26 (0.60 seconds)Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 164 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 376 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
State Of Rajasthan vs Raja Ram on 13 August, 2003
Even otherwise, it is settled law that the appellant court may only
interfere in an appeal against acquittal when there are substantial and
compelling reasons to do so [See Sheo Swarup v. King-Emperor,
AIR 1934 PC 227 (2); M.G. Agarwal v. State of Maharashtra, AIR
1963 SC 200 (paragraph 16 and 17); Tota Singh and Anr. v. State of
Crl. L.P. 541/2016 Page 11 of 12
Punjab, AIR 1987 SC 108: (1987) 2 SCC 529 (paragraph 6); State of
Rajasthan v. Raja Ram, (2003) 8 SCC 180 (paragraph 7);
Chandrappa v. State of Karnataka, (2007) 4 SCC 415 (paragraph
Chandrappa & Ors vs State Of Karnataka on 15 February, 2007
Even otherwise, it is settled law that the appellant court may only
interfere in an appeal against acquittal when there are substantial and
compelling reasons to do so [See Sheo Swarup v. King-Emperor,
AIR 1934 PC 227 (2); M.G. Agarwal v. State of Maharashtra, AIR
1963 SC 200 (paragraph 16 and 17); Tota Singh and Anr. v. State of
Crl. L.P. 541/2016 Page 11 of 12
Punjab, AIR 1987 SC 108: (1987) 2 SCC 529 (paragraph 6); State of
Rajasthan v. Raja Ram, (2003) 8 SCC 180 (paragraph 7);
Chandrappa v. State of Karnataka, (2007) 4 SCC 415 (paragraph
Ghurey Lal vs State Of U.P on 30 July, 2008
42); Ghurey Lal v. State of U.P., (2008) 10 SCC 450 (paragraph 73);
and Muralidhar @ Gidda v. State of Karnataka, (2014) 5 SCC 730
(paragraph 12)].
Muralidhar @ Gidda & Anr vs State Of Karnataka on 9 April, 2014
42); Ghurey Lal v. State of U.P., (2008) 10 SCC 450 (paragraph 73);
and Muralidhar @ Gidda v. State of Karnataka, (2014) 5 SCC 730
(paragraph 12)].