Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.50 seconds)
Mujibur Rahman vs State Rep By on 17 December, 2020 cites

S. Jeevanantham vs State Through Inspector Of Police, Tn on 21 April, 2004

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would state that the petitioner is a member of Social Democratic Party of India, a Political Organization and they are actively participating in the social welfare works throughout the nation. More remarkably, they are the frontline helpers in the Chennai Flood disaster and in the present Covid-19 pandemic situation. On 05.08.2019, a peaceful public gathering was conducted by the petitioner along with others near Railway junction at Madurai and the same was ended within few minutes without any rustle. According to the prosecution, the petitioner along with 108 members assembled in the occurrence spot and protested against the murder of one Halid Ansary and restrained the public movement and caused public nuisance. Accordingly, a case in Crime No.524 of 2019 has been registered against the petitioner and others for the offences under Sections 143 & 341 IPC, based on the complaint given by the 2nd respondent. Subsequently, charge sheet was also been registered in S.T.C No.2262 of 2020, on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai. The learned counsel would further state that on the face of FIR, it does not make out any offence and that the issue in the present case is covered by the decisions of this court in http://www.judis.nic.in 2/6 Crl.O.P.(MD).No.15065 of 2020 CRL.OP(MD)No.3770 of 2012 dated 06.06.2018 and Jeevanantham vs. State reported in 2018 (2) K.W. (Crl) 606.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 115 - Full Document
1