Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 32 (0.26 seconds)Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 379 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 106 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Malkhansingh & Ors vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 8 July, 2003
"110. A popular and widely used method of accused
identification, by witness, in criminal trials, is the identification
parade. TIP procedures are used, where witnesses who claim to
have seen the accused at, or about the time of occurrence to
identify such accused from the midst of other individuals, who
bear physical attributes similar to them, without any aid or other
source. TIPs are meant to test witness veracity and their
capability to identify unknown persons. TIPs should normally be
conducted at the earliest possible time to eliminate the chance of
accused being shown to witnesses before the identification
parade, which might otherwise affect such witnesses' memory.
TIPs are conducted during investigation; however, there is no
provision of law enabling an accused to claim it as a matter of
Page No.# 31/40
right, as held in Malkhansingh v. State of M.P. (2003) 5 SCC 746,
In Ramanathan v. State of T.N. [Ramanathan v. State of T.N.,
(1978) 3 SCC 86, para 18 this Court outlined the utility and
weight of a TIP.