Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.22 seconds)Section 143 in The Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Section 146 in The Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Section 142 in The Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Vishaka & Ors vs State Of Rajasthan & Ors on 13 August, 1997
The learned counsel relied on the decision of the Supreme
Court in Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan: (1997) 6 SCC 241 in support of its
contention that the decision of the Supreme Court could be read as declared
law for imposing the impugned charges.
Article 142 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 481 in The Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
M.C. Mehta vs Union Of India & Ors on 18 March, 2004
25. The learned senior counsel for the petitioner contended that recourse to
Article 142 of the Constitution of India cannot be taken to supplant any
existing law, impose a tax or ignore the substantive rights of parties. And
therefore, the orders passed by the Supreme Court for implementation of the
outdoor policy cannot be read to include imposition of the impugned
charges. This was disputed by the learned counsel for the MCD and it was
contended that the Supreme Court had adopted a specific policy which
included imposition of ―a fine as decided by MCD Commissioner‖. It was
further submitted that since the outdoor policy specifically included
charging regulatory fee for advertisement, such fee could be charged by
virtue of the order dated 12.10.2007 passed by the Supreme Court in M.C.
Mehta II (supra).
1