Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.44 seconds)Section 16 in The Employees’ Provident Funds And Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 [Entire Act]
Sayaji Mills Ltd vs Regional Provident Fund Commissioner on 21 December, 1984
With due respect this decision cannot be relied upon in view of the ratio decided by the Apex Court in Sayaji Mill's case (supra).
The Employees’ Provident Funds And Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952
P.G. Textile Mills (Pvt.) Limited, ... vs Union Of India And Ors. on 19 November, 1974
9. Similarly, in the case of P.G. Textiles Mills v. Union of India, (supra) the old company business was completely wound up and closed and thereafter there had been Court sale of all the assets of the old company. In that context the Gujarat High Court held that there could never be continuity of the liability to the new employer. This decision also therefore will be of no help to the petitioner.
Section 7A in The Employees’ Provident Funds And Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 [Entire Act]
The Companies Act, 1956
1