Vijay Narain Singh vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 12 April, 1984
Be that as it may, by now, a period of about 30 years has since elapsed ever since then. Hence, it would be highly unjust and unfair at this stage to disturb the absorption of the appellant and further it would not be advisable to leave the matter for probing inlo the question of adequate procedure whether adopted or not for his absorption in the manner he was so absorbed and whether or not he lacks requisite criterion for being absorbed under the Absorption Rules. We are satisfied with the conclusions of the Tribunal which are sustained on the basis of the material on record in the light of the Absorption Rules is not open to challenge. We find support from the observation of this Court in Vijay Singh v. State (1) followed in D.K. Sanghi v. State (2). Accordingly, we find error or law in the impugned judgments of the learned Single Judge and find no reason to disturb the conclusions of the learned Tribunal in respect of the absorption of the appellant.