Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 26 (0.33 seconds)

Rajbir @ Raju & Anr vs State Of Haryana on 22 November, 2010

In the given facts and circumstances, it would be appropriate to refer to the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rajbir @ Raju v. State of Haryana, (2010) 15 SCC 116whereby the Court had directed that all trial courts in India should ordinarily add section 302 IPC to the charge of section 304B IPC, so that death sentences can be imposed in such heinous and barbaric crimes against women.However, this should not be done in a mechanical manner, rather after considering the nature of evidence available in the case, as clarified by the Apex Court in Jasvinder Saini v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi), (2013) 7 SCC 256.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 26 - Full Document

Jasvinder Saini & Ors vs State(Govt.Of Nct Of Delhi) on 2 July, 2013

In the given facts and circumstances, it would be appropriate to refer to the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rajbir @ Raju v. State of Haryana, (2010) 15 SCC 116whereby the Court had directed that all trial courts in India should ordinarily add section 302 IPC to the charge of section 304B IPC, so that death sentences can be imposed in such heinous and barbaric crimes against women.However, this should not be done in a mechanical manner, rather after considering the nature of evidence available in the case, as clarified by the Apex Court in Jasvinder Saini v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi), (2013) 7 SCC 256.
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 150 - T S Thakur - Full Document
1   2 3 Next