Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 26 (0.44 seconds)Section 318 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 316 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 406 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 4 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 173 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Mohan Lal @ Ranjan Mohan Bhatnagar vs The State (Nct Of Delhi) on 23 August, 2011
In ANURAG BHATNAGAR's case supra, the Apex Court
once again declined to exercise its jurisdiction to quash the criminal
proceedings, noting that the memorandum of understanding
between the parties was not a mere commercial arrangement
simpliciter, but one imbued with allegations of inducement and
criminal breach of trust, as borne out from the averments contained
in the complaint. The Court held that the allegations, if taken
to its face value, were sufficient to constitute the
commission of a criminal offence and therefore, warranted
adjudication through the rigours of a criminal trial.
State Of Haryana And Ors vs Ch. Bhajan Lal And Ors on 21 November, 1990
46. It is well settled by a catena of decisions of this
Court, especially in State of Haryana v. Ch. Bhajan Lal Singh,
2
2025 SCC OnLine SC 1514
66
that the discretion to quash an FIR at a nascent stage has to be
exercised with great caution and circumspection.