Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (0.37 seconds)

Transport & Dock Workers Union & Ors vs Mumbai Port Trust & Anr on 15 November, 2010

In view of the above, we dismiss the writ petition on the ground of availability of alternative remedy under the I.D. Act. All the questions raised in the writ petition are left open to be agitated by the parties concerned before the appropriate forum. 27 Further, in Transport & Dock Workers Union & others Vs. Mumbai Port Trust & another [2011(2) SCC 575], the Supreme court held that in matters covered by the provisions of the ID Act, resort must be made for adjudication under the ID Act and the Court shall not entertain matters under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The relevant passage from the said judgment reads thus:
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 183 - M Katju - Full Document

Lalita Kumari vs Govt.Of U.P.& Ors on 12 November, 2013

2. Take criminal action for intimidating the officials by threaten to lodge a false complaint on caste abuse and cause communal riots. 31 The letter sent by the Management does not disclose any specific offence committed by the workmen including date, time and the event. The Supreme Court, in Lalita Kumari Vs. Govt. of Uttar Pradesh [(2014) (2) SCC 1] has held that the police are mandatorily bound to register an FIR lodged by a complainant. It was held as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 71 - Cited by 18813 - P Sathasivam - Full Document
1   2 3 Next