Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.20 seconds)
Surat Singh Punia vs Rajasthan Service Appellate Tribunal ... on 8 August, 2003 cites

Union Of India And Another vs N.P. Thomas on 22 September, 1992

4. The Court can interfere with the impugned transfer order only if the transfer order is in contravention of the statutory provisions or had been passed on malafide reasons. The issue of transfer and posting has been considered time and again by the Apex Court and law has been settled by catena of decisions. It is entirely upto the competent authority to decide when, where and at what point of time a public servant is to be transferred from his present posting. Reference is made to the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Union of India v. S.L. Abbas (1), Shilpi Bose v. State of Bihar (2), Union of India v. N.P. Thomas (3), Chief Manager (Tel.)
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 131 - S R Pandian - Full Document

Dr. J.N. Banavalikar vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi And Anr on 21 September, 1995

8. Thus, it is clear that Court can interfere with the transfer order only on the grounds of malafides or if the order is found to be in violation of statutory Rules. None of such ground exists in this case. Moreso, if the allegations of malafides are to be alleged, it becomes the duty of the employee to implead the person(s) against whom the allegations are made. (Vide J.M. Banawalikar v. Municipal Corporation, Delhi and Ors. (11), State of Bihar and Ors. v. P.P. Sharma (12), I.K. Mishra v. Union of India and Ors. (13), and All India State Bank Officers Federation and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors. (14).
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 74 - G N Ray - Full Document

State Of Bihar Etc. Etc vs P.P. Sharma, Ias And Anr on 2 April, 1991

8. Thus, it is clear that Court can interfere with the transfer order only on the grounds of malafides or if the order is found to be in violation of statutory Rules. None of such ground exists in this case. Moreso, if the allegations of malafides are to be alleged, it becomes the duty of the employee to implead the person(s) against whom the allegations are made. (Vide J.M. Banawalikar v. Municipal Corporation, Delhi and Ors. (11), State of Bihar and Ors. v. P.P. Sharma (12), I.K. Mishra v. Union of India and Ors. (13), and All India State Bank Officers Federation and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors. (14).
Supreme Court of India Cites 31 - Cited by 15092 - K Singh - Full Document
1   2 Next