State Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi vs Deepak Bhatiya on 7 March, 2018
The other cars were not blocking the lane. The aforesaid cars were parked in
the entire lane which were either on the right side or the left side. When
accused came towards her, he was alone or might be with one child. She did
State Vs. Deepak Bhateja; FIR No. 279/2017, PS Amar Colony 5/17
not know the age of the child. She had stated the fact that accused told her
that "he was not scared of the police officials and no one could take any
action against him and also told me that I shall have to face dire
consequences". She was confronted with statement u/s 164 CrPC and
statement Ex.PW1/A. She had disclosed the fact that the accused told her
that nobody have the power to get his car removed, in her statement u/s 164
Cr.P.C and in her complaint. She was confronted with statement u/s 164
CrPC. When accused reached the spot the incident finished within five
minutes. She had not given a call to any of her family members when accused
misbehaved with her. She had not raised alarm at the aforesaid incidents since
the same occurred very suddenly. She had not asked the Dhobi for any help.
None of the public persons or neighours gathered on the spot at the time of
incident. The place where the incident occurred was at a walking distance
from her house. Police reached her house around 6.30 PM and there was only
one police official who reached her house. She had narrated the incident to
the police official at that time. The police official remained at her house for
about 1520 minutes. She had not shown the place of incident to the police on
the date of incident. She did not hand over copy of her online complaint to the
IO since he was not supportive enough to take her complaint. Her medical
examination was not got conducted by the police official.