Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.29 seconds)Section 9 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
The Arbitration Act, 1940
Hdfc Bank Ltd. vs Satpal Singh Bakshi on 13 September, 2012
34. We are, thus, unequivocally of the view that the
judgments of the Full Bench of the Orissa High Court
in Sarthak Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Orissa Rural
Development Corporation Limited, the Full Bench of
the Delhi High Court in HDFC Bank
Limited v. Satpal Singh Bakshi (supra) and the
Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court
in Pradeep Kumar Gupta v. State of U.P. lay down the
correct proposition of Law and the view ex-pressed by
the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Deccan Chronicles
Holdings Limited v. Union of India following the
overruled decision of the Orissa High Court in Subash
Chandra Panda v. State of Orissa does not set forth
the correct position in law. SARFAESI proceedings
and arbitration proceedings, thus, can go hand in hand.
Subash Chandra Panda And 3 Ors. vs State Of Orissa on 4 July, 2001
34. We are, thus, unequivocally of the view that the
judgments of the Full Bench of the Orissa High Court
in Sarthak Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Orissa Rural
Development Corporation Limited, the Full Bench of
the Delhi High Court in HDFC Bank
Limited v. Satpal Singh Bakshi (supra) and the
Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court
in Pradeep Kumar Gupta v. State of U.P. lay down the
correct proposition of Law and the view ex-pressed by
the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Deccan Chronicles
Holdings Limited v. Union of India following the
overruled decision of the Orissa High Court in Subash
Chandra Panda v. State of Orissa does not set forth
the correct position in law. SARFAESI proceedings
and arbitration proceedings, thus, can go hand in hand.
Lalit Mohan Madhan & Ors. vs Reliance Capital Ltd. on 7 December, 2017
19. He submits that this Court ought not to interfere with
proceedings, under the SARFAESI Act and relies for the said purpose,
on the judgment of a coordinate Single Bench of this Court in Lalit
Mohan Madhan v. Reliance Capital Limited 1.
Article 10 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 13 in The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
M/S Transcore vs Union Of India & Anr on 29 November, 2006
In Transcore v. Union of India (2008) 1 SCC 125,
while discussing the interplay between the Debt Recovery Act
and the SARFAESI Act, the Supreme Court emphasized that
the remedies for recovery under the Debt Recovery Act and
SARFAESI Act are complementary to each other and,
therefore, doctrine of election has no application.