Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.19 seconds)
Vythilingam Chettiar vs Rangaswami Padayachi on 9 September, 1988 cites

Ramaswami Gounder vs Ramaswami Gounder And Ors. on 16 April, 1971

In Keruppanna Gounder v. Ramaswami, (1984) 2 Mad LJ 207 it was held that the debt due under the promissory note is one and entire and it is not possible to split it up into two and file two separate suits for the same debt, and, that Order 2, Rule 2, C.P.C. would also apply, and that a repeal of a statutory provision does not affect the previous operation of those provisions unless the statute specifically says that the repealed provision should be taken to have been not in the statute book at all.
Madras High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 13 - Full Document

Muthuveerappa Chetty Alias Vellayappa ... vs Adaikappa Chetty And Ors. on 14 July, 1920

13. It is surprising to note that Mr. R. S. Venkatachari, learned counsel, who is reputed to placeevery conceivable decision on a point, whether reported or not, having argued the case in Lakshminarayana Reddiar v. Balarama Chettiar , none of the decisions which have been rendered earlier had been referred to in that decision and the solitary decision which had found a place therein is Muthuveerappa Chetti v. Adaikappa Chetti 39 Mad LJ 312 : ILR 43 Mad 845 : (AIR 1920 Mad 663), which dealt with the aspect of annulment.
Madras High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 8 - Full Document
1