Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.20 seconds)

Sidharth Srivastava & Ors. Bharat Pal & ... vs Ravindra Pratap Singh & Ors on 5 June, 2003

17. It has been held by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of   Raju @ Rajpal  Vs State  &  Ors (2014(3)(JCC)  1894)    that  where  the  simple injury has been caused on the head of injured without premeditation, the offence   u/s   323   IPC   would   be   made   out   instead   of   308   IPC.   In   the present   case   also,   the   complainant   has   suffered   simple   injury.   The relevant portion of the said judgment reads as under:­ "The nature of injuries suffered by her was `simple' caused by blunt object. Only one wound was found on her body.
Supreme Court of India Cites 29 - Cited by 16 - S V Patil - Full Document

Mohd Mussabir & Anr vs State & Anr on 3 August, 2011

15. It has been held by Hon'ble High Court in the case reported as 2011 (7) AD (Delhi) 90, titled as Mussabir & Anr v. State and Anr.  that for constituting the offence u/s 308 IPC, it has to be established that the assault   was   premeditated   and   the   accused   had   knowledge   that   the assault would result in injury which might lead to death of the victim. Thus, for proving the offence u/s 308 IPC, prosecution has to establish that the assault in the present case was premeditated as well as the injury caused to the victim was sufficient to lead to his death.
Delhi High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 14 - S R Bhat - Full Document
1   2 Next