Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.21 seconds)Section 28 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
State Of Punjab vs Amarjit Singh & Anr on 8 February, 2011
Now, the perusal of judgment of this Court in Labh Singh's case
(supra) shows that while referring the judgment of Apex Court in
Sunder's case (supra), it was held that person entitled to
compensation awarded is also entitled to get interest on the
aggregate amount including solatium. The reference was
accordingly answered.
M/S Punjab Small Industries And Export ... vs Shambhu Ram (Deceased) Thro His Lrs And ... on 16 February, 2018
In view of the judgment in Sunder's case (supra) as well as
other judgments referred to in Shambhu Ram's case (supra), it has to be
held that the parties are governed by the award passed by the Court. In case
the interest on the solatium is specifically awarded in the award, the
Executing Court cannot go beyond the decree and interest on solatium is to
be awarded in terms of the award passed by the Court.
Shyam Sunder Agarwal & Co vs Union Of India on 9 January, 1996
In view of the judgment in Sunder's case (supra) as well as
other judgments referred to in Shambhu Ram's case (supra), it has to be
held that the parties are governed by the award passed by the Court. In case
the interest on the solatium is specifically awarded in the award, the
Executing Court cannot go beyond the decree and interest on solatium is to
be awarded in terms of the award passed by the Court.
1