Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.18 seconds)
Trinath Sethi No.3 vs Coal India Limited & Ors on 19 June, 2009 cites

Anil Kumar vs Presiding Officer And Ors. on 8 May, 1985

It also appears from the report of enquiry that several defence witnesses deposed in support of the claim of the petitioner that he was the original employee and that he was not an imposter. The Enquiry Officer has not taken care to reject the evidence of the defence witness by assigning a single reason. Non-consideration of the evidence adduced by the defence witnesses is a serious lapse committed by the Enquiry Officer, which has vitiated the report of enquiry. The report of enquiry is indefensible on the authority of the decision reported in AIR 1985 SC 1121 (Anil Kumar vs. Presiding Officer).
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 204 - D A Desai - Full Document
1