Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.22 seconds)Col. Avtar Singh Sekhon vs Union Of India on 31 July, 1980
9. In Col. Avtar Singh Sekhon v. Union of India,
[1980 Supp SCC 562], the Supreme Court held in paragraph 12
as under :-
Sow Chandra Kanta And Another vs Sheik Habib on 13 March, 1975
In Sow Chandra Kante v.
Sheikh Habib, (1975) 1 SCC 674, this
Court observed : (SCC p. 675, para 1)
"A review of a judgment is a
serious step and reluctant resort to it is
proper only where a glaring omission
or patent mistake or like grave error
has crept in earlier by judicial
fallibility.... The present stage is not a
virgin ground but review of an earlier
Patna High Court MJC No.4333 of 2016 dt.07-01-2020
10/13
order which has the normal feature of
finality".
Parsion Devi & Ors vs Sumitri Devi & Ors on 14 October, 1997
10. The scope of Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC, dealing
with review of a judgment, has been succinctly stated by the
Supreme Court in Parsion Devi v. Sumitri Devi [(1997) 8 SCC
715], in paragraph 7 as under :-
Lily Thomas, Etc. Etc vs Union Of India & Ors on 5 May, 2000
In Lily Thomas v. Union of India, [(2000)6
SCC 224], the principle was reiterated by the Supreme Court
with a caution that in exercise of power of review, the Court
may correct the mistake but not to substitute the view. The mere
possibility of two views on the subject is not a ground for
review.
Section 114 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
1