Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.25 seconds)Section 14 in The Delhi Rent Act, 1995 [Entire Act]
Jasvinder Singh Son Of Shri Pritam Singh ... vs Kedar Nath Son Of Late Shri Khushi Ram & ... on 5 October, 2016
Referring Jasvinder Singh's case, it has been submitted that
benefit of re-entry is available to a tenant against whom eviction
proceedings were pending at the time of introduction of right to re-entry in
the Rent Act and thus it has been claimed that in present case also
through Eviction Petition was filed in the year 2011, but the same has
been decided after introduction of right to re-entry in the Rent Act.
Prem Lal vs Soma Devi on 13 December, 2019
13. Learned counsel for the landlord has also placed reliance
on the judgment passed in Prem Lal Vs. Soma Devi, reported in 2020
r to
(1) RCR (Rent) 371, wherein it has been observed as under:-
Diwakar Dutt Kukreti vs Eih Associated Hotels Ltd. & Another on 18 September, 2017
14. To substantiate the plea that after parting away with the
possession of the premises in favour of landlord, tenant forfeits his right
of re-entry, reliance has been placed on judgment dated 18.9.2017
passed in Civil Revision No. 79 of 2017, titled as Diwakar Dutt Kukreti
Vs. EIH Associated Hotels Ltd. & Another, 2017 SCC OnLine HP
1435.
Prakash Kaur vs Rajwant Singh Manta on 29 September, 2023
15. Reliance has also placed on behalf of landlord on judgment
dated 29.9.2023, Civil Revision No. 27 of 2023, titled as Prakash Kaur
Vs. Rajwant Singh Manta, wherein this Court has observed as under:-
Rattan Chand vs Madhu Bharat Chadha & Another on 21 March, 2023
16. Similar observation have been made by this Court in Civil
Revision No. 155 of 2019, titled as Rattan Chand Vs. Madhu Bharat
Chadha & Another, decided on 21.3.2023.
Kusum Devi vs Mohan Lal (Dead) By Lrs on 8 April, 2009
18. Learned counsel for the landlord by referring judgment of
the Supreme Court in Kusum Devi Vs. Mohan Lal (dead) By. LRs.
Hari Dass Sharma vs Vikas Sood & Ors on 29 April, 2013
In Hari Dass Sharma's case, right of re-entry had been
recognized by clarifying that it will be open to the tenant to apply for re-