Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 27 (0.24 seconds)Kedar Nath Singh vs State Of Bihar on 20 January, 1962
( Kedar Nath
Singh case [Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bi-
har, 1962 SCC OnLine SC 6: 1962 Supp (2)
SCR 769: AIR 1962 SC 955], SCC OnLine SC
para 27)
As the statement of law at para 45.5 above indicates, it
applies to cases under Sections 124-A and 505IPC.
According to this Court, only such activities which would
be intended or have a tendency to create disorder or
disturbance of public peace by resort to violence are
rendered penal.
Manzar Sayeed Khan vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr on 5 April, 2007
AIPC is the intention to promote feelings of
enmity or hatred between different classes of
people. The intention has to be judged primarily
by the language of the piece of writing and the
circumstances in which it was written and
16 ( 2025:HHC:27866 )
published. The matter complained of within the
ambit of Section 153-A must be read as a whole.
One cannot rely on strongly worded and
isolated passages for proving the charge, nor
indeed can one take a sentence here and a
sentence there and connect them by a
meticulous process of inferential reasoning
[Manzar Sayeed Khan v. State of Maharashtra,
(2007) 5 SCC 1: (2007) 2 SCC (Cri) 41s]."
Section 124A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Kedar Nath Sahu vs State Of Chhattisgarh 24 Mcc/470/2018 ... on 27 June, 2018
( Kedar Nath
Singh case [Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bi-
har, 1962 SCC OnLine SC 6: 1962 Supp (2)
SCR 769: AIR 1962 SC 955], SCC OnLine SC
para 27)
As the statement of law at para 45.5 above indicates, it
applies to cases under Sections 124-A and 505IPC.
According to this Court, only such activities which would
be intended or have a tendency to create disorder or
disturbance of public peace by resort to violence are
rendered penal.
Chaman Lal & Co. vs Income Tax Officer (Ito V. Chaman Lal & ... on 8 June, 1995
26. While considering as to whether bail ought to be
granted in a matter involving a serious criminal offence,
the Court must consider relevant factors like the nature
of the accusations made against the accused, the manner
in which the crime is alleged to have been committed, the
gravity of the offence, the role attributed to the accused,
the criminal antecedents of the accused, the probability
of tampering of the witnesses and repeating the offence,
if the accused are released on bail, the likelihood of the
accused being unavailable in the event bail is granted, the
5 ( 2025:HHC:27866 )
possibility of obstructing the proceedings and evading
the courts of justice and the overall desirability of
releasing the accused on bail. [Refer: Chaman Lal v. State
of U.P. [Chaman Lal v. State of U.P., (2004) 7 SCC 525:
Shri Rawatpura Sarkar , Lok Kalyan Trust vs State Of Chhattisgarh 3 Wpc/4094/2019 ... on 14 November, 2019
2004 SCC (Cri) 1974]; Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh
Ranjan [Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan, (2004)
7 SCC 528: 2004 SCC (Cri) 1977]; Masroor v. State of
U.P. [Masroor v. State of U.P., (2009) 14 SCC 286 : (2010) 1
SCC (Cri) 1368]; Prasanta Kumar Sarkar v. Ashis
Chatterjee [Prasanta Kumar Sarkar v. Ashis Chatterjee,
(2010) 14 SCC 496 : (2011) 3 SCC (Cri) 765]; Neeru
Yadav v. State of U.P. [Neeru Yadav v. State of U.P., (2014)
16 SCC 508 : (2015) 3 SCC (Cri) 527]; Anil Kumar
Yadav v. State (NCT of Delhi)[Anil Kumar Yadav v. State
(NCT of Delhi), (2018) 12 SCC 129 : (2018) 3 SCC (Cri)
425]; Mahipal v. Rajesh Kumar [Mahipal v. Rajesh
Kumar, (2020) 2 SCC 118 : (2020) 1 SCC (Cri) 558] .]
Prasanta Kumar Sarkar vs Ashis Chatterjee & Anr on 29 October, 2010
2004 SCC (Cri) 1974]; Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh
Ranjan [Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan, (2004)
7 SCC 528: 2004 SCC (Cri) 1977]; Masroor v. State of
U.P. [Masroor v. State of U.P., (2009) 14 SCC 286 : (2010) 1
SCC (Cri) 1368]; Prasanta Kumar Sarkar v. Ashis
Chatterjee [Prasanta Kumar Sarkar v. Ashis Chatterjee,
(2010) 14 SCC 496 : (2011) 3 SCC (Cri) 765]; Neeru
Yadav v. State of U.P. [Neeru Yadav v. State of U.P., (2014)
16 SCC 508 : (2015) 3 SCC (Cri) 527]; Anil Kumar
Yadav v. State (NCT of Delhi)[Anil Kumar Yadav v. State
(NCT of Delhi), (2018) 12 SCC 129 : (2018) 3 SCC (Cri)
425]; Mahipal v. Rajesh Kumar [Mahipal v. Rajesh
Kumar, (2020) 2 SCC 118 : (2020) 1 SCC (Cri) 558] .]
Signature Not Verified Digitally ... vs Mr. Puneet Saini, Adv. For Petitioner In ... on 31 August, 2022
2004 SCC (Cri) 1974]; Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh
Ranjan [Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan, (2004)
7 SCC 528: 2004 SCC (Cri) 1977]; Masroor v. State of
U.P. [Masroor v. State of U.P., (2009) 14 SCC 286 : (2010) 1
SCC (Cri) 1368]; Prasanta Kumar Sarkar v. Ashis
Chatterjee [Prasanta Kumar Sarkar v. Ashis Chatterjee,
(2010) 14 SCC 496 : (2011) 3 SCC (Cri) 765]; Neeru
Yadav v. State of U.P. [Neeru Yadav v. State of U.P., (2014)
16 SCC 508 : (2015) 3 SCC (Cri) 527]; Anil Kumar
Yadav v. State (NCT of Delhi)[Anil Kumar Yadav v. State
(NCT of Delhi), (2018) 12 SCC 129 : (2018) 3 SCC (Cri)
425]; Mahipal v. Rajesh Kumar [Mahipal v. Rajesh
Kumar, (2020) 2 SCC 118 : (2020) 1 SCC (Cri) 558] .]
Mahipal vs Rajesh Kumar @ Polia on 5 December, 2019
2004 SCC (Cri) 1974]; Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh
Ranjan [Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan, (2004)
7 SCC 528: 2004 SCC (Cri) 1977]; Masroor v. State of
U.P. [Masroor v. State of U.P., (2009) 14 SCC 286 : (2010) 1
SCC (Cri) 1368]; Prasanta Kumar Sarkar v. Ashis
Chatterjee [Prasanta Kumar Sarkar v. Ashis Chatterjee,
(2010) 14 SCC 496 : (2011) 3 SCC (Cri) 765]; Neeru
Yadav v. State of U.P. [Neeru Yadav v. State of U.P., (2014)
16 SCC 508 : (2015) 3 SCC (Cri) 527]; Anil Kumar
Yadav v. State (NCT of Delhi)[Anil Kumar Yadav v. State
(NCT of Delhi), (2018) 12 SCC 129 : (2018) 3 SCC (Cri)
425]; Mahipal v. Rajesh Kumar [Mahipal v. Rajesh
Kumar, (2020) 2 SCC 118 : (2020) 1 SCC (Cri) 558] .]