Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2 (0.27 seconds)Kaipadath Property Development ... vs State Of Kerala on 20 January, 2011
6. Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf
of the respondents, per contra pointed out that the
proceedings under Clause 7(1) was issued as early as on
05.08.2008 and therefore the contention cannot be
sustained. He placed reliance on another decision of this
Court in Kaipadath Property Development Company
(Pvt) Ltd. v. State of Kerala [2011 (1) KLT 526],
wherein it is held that orders issued under the KLU Order
cannot be taken as inoperative or to have been nullified by
the provisions of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land &
Wetland Act, 2008. In answer to the above contention, the
learned counsel for the petitioner pointed out that even
going by the admissions in the counter affidavit the order in
question was served by way of affixture only on 18.8.2008
i.e. after commencement of the Kerala Conservation of
W.P.(C)No.5624 of 2009
-8-
Paddy Land & Wetland Act, 2008.
1