Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 65 (0.95 seconds)Article 142 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 4 in The Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002
Section 14 in The Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
Article 254 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 246 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 32 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 5 in The Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
Union Carbide Corporation Etc. Etc vs Union Of India Etc. Etc on 3 October, 1991
20. Difference between procedural and
substantive law in jurisprudential terms is
contentious, albeit not necessary to be
examined in depth in the present decision [
However, this aspect has been, to some extent,
examined in paras 24 to 37, 56 and 57 herein.]
, as in terms of the dictum enunciated by this
Court in Union Carbide Corpn. [Union Carbide
Corpn. v. Union of India, (1991) 4 SCC 584]
and Supreme Court Bar Assn. [Supreme Court
Bar Assn. v. Union of India, (1998) 4 SCC 409] ,
exercise of power under Article 142(1) of the
Constitution of India to do “complete justice” in
a “cause or matter” is prohibited only when the
exercise is to pass an order which is plainly and
expressly barred by statutory provisions of
substantive law based on fundamental
considerations of general or specific public
policy.