Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.50 seconds)

K. Sampangirama Raju, S. Govindaraju, ... vs Vth Income-Tax Officer And Ors. on 9 December, 1987

13. Before the CIT(A), the assessee contended the legality of issue of notice u/s. 148 by reiterating the submissions made before the AO. The CIT(A) did not accept the contentions of the assessee by stating that the assessee has not challenged the jurisdictional issue before the AO and in this regard relied on the decision of Karnataka High Court in the case of N. Govindaraju v. ITO. The CIT(A) further held that the ITA No.675/Bang/2020 Page 9 of 16 reasons for reopening have been properly recorded by the AO and that the income of the assessee has escaped assessment therefore the AO has correctly exercised jurisdiction.
Karnataka High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 17 - Full Document
1   2 Next