Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 25 (0.69 seconds)Sheikh Hasib Alias Tabarak vs The State Of Bihar on 23 August, 1971
This Court relied on the decision in Sheikh Hasib (alias) Tabarak v. State of Bihar (1971 (II) SCWR 446).
Section 145 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
R.P. Kapur vs Pratap Singh Kairon And Others on 9 August, 1961
In R.P. Kapur v. Pratap Singh Kairon (1964 (1) Crl. L.J. 244) a Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court while considering the argument that no disciplinary proceedings can be commenced against a Government servant for any act in respect of a First Information Report under Section 154 of the Criminal Procedure Code observed as follows:-
Mohinder Singh Gill & Anr vs The Chiief Election Commissioner, New ... on 2 December, 1977
In Mohinder Singh's case, (supra) the Constitutional Banch had observed as follows in para 55 of the judgment:
Km. Neelima Misra vs Dr. Harinder Kaur Paintal And Ors on 21 March, 1990
The necessity of fairness or fair procedure in administrative action has been further emphasisted in a later decision in Neelima Misra v. Harinder Kaur Paintal (AIR) 1990 SC 1402. It was observed by the Supreme Court as follows, in paragraphs 22 and 23 of the judgment."
State Of Orissa vs Dr. (Miss) Binapani Dei & Ors on 7 February, 1967
"22. An administrative order which involves civil consequences must be made consistently with the rule expressed in the Latin Maxim audi alteram partem. It means that the decision-maker should afford to any party to a dispute an opportunity to present his case. A large number of authorities are on this point and we will not travel over the field of authorities. What is now not in dispute is that the person concerned must be informed of the case against him and the evidence in support thereof and must be given a fair opportunity to meet the case before an adverse decision is taken. Ridge V.Baldwin (1963 (2) All. ER 66) (supra) ; State of Orissa v. Dr. Binapani Dei, (1967-II-LLJ-266)
Maneka Gandhi vs Union Of India on 25 January, 1978
This statement has been quoted in Maneka Gandhi's case also.