Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.25 seconds)Section 11 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Smt. Shanti Devi vs Amal Kumar Banerjee on 9 January, 1981
15.In the instant case Ex.A1/registered rental agreement
between the parties, was of the year 18.08.1982. Though there
was some reference with regard to the earlier agreement, by efflux
of time, those rental agreement had became terminated and after
two months only a fresh rental agreement was entered under Ex.A1
and hence, the plea raised in written statement that the defendants
are tenants even after the determination of the contractual lease, as
held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the judgment reported in
(1981) 2 SCC 199 - (Shanti Devi Vs. Amal Kumar Banerjee)
as cited supra, the defendants are not the tenants till Ex.A1 came
into force. Hence, I have no doubt in my mind to hold that Ex.A1 is
a fresh rental agreement between the parties.
13/26
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Bhagabandas Agarwalla vs Bhagwandas Kanu & Ors on 25 February, 1977
17(a).In the decision reported in (1977) 2 SCC 646 -
(Bhagabandas Agarwalla Vs. Bhagwandas Kanu), wherein,
Hon'ble Supreme Court has held as under:
The Chennai City Tenants Protection Act, 1921
Section 24 in The Indian Partnership Act, 1932 [Entire Act]
Section 24 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Bhagyanagar Khadi Samithi, Hyderabad vs S.B. Chitnis (Died) And Others on 28 August, 1998
8)1998 SCC OnLine AP 469 - (Bhagyanagar Khadi
Samithi Vs. S.B.Chitnis)