Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 26 (0.25 seconds)
Faisal Isshaq And Ors. vs State And Anr. on 12 October, 2017 cites

State Of Bihar vs Murad Ali Khan, Farukh Salauddin & ... on 10 October, 1988

In Bhajan Lal (supra) the two-Judge Bench after referring to Hazari Lal Gupta v. Rameshwar Prasad[7], Jehan Singh v. Delhi Administration[8], Amar Nath v. State of Haryana[9], Kurukshetra University v. State of Haryana[10], State of Bihar v. J.A.C. Saldanha[11], State of West Bengal v. Swapan Kumar Guha[12], Smt. Nagawwa v. Veeranna Shivalingappa Konjalgi[13], Madhavrao Jiwajirao Scindia v. Sambhajirao Chandrojirao Angre[14], State of Bihar v. Murad 561-A Cr.P.C. No. 415/2017 a/w MP No. 01/2017 Page 8 of 12 9 Ali Khan[15] and some other authorities that had dealt with the contours of exercise of inherent powers of the High Court, thought it appropriate to mention certain category of cases by way of illustration wherein the extraordinary power under Article 226 of the Constitution or inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. could be exercised either to prevent abuse of the process of any court or otherwise to secure the ends of justice. The Court also observed that it may not be possible to lay down any precise, clearly defined and sufficiently channelized and inflexible guidelines or rigid formulae and to give an exhaustive list of myriad cases wherein such power should be exercised. The illustrations given by the Court need to be recapitulated:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 41 - Cited by 636 - M Rangnath - Full Document
1   2 3 Next