Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.16 seconds)Ex. Asi Shadi Ram vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors. on 22 February, 2008
The applicant is further placing its
reliance on the judgment of Hon'ble High Court in Shadi Ram (Ex. ASI) Vs.
4 OA No.4577/2013
Govt. of NCTD & Others as the case of the applicant is purely covered by
aforesaid judgments.
Mahinder Dutt Sharma vs U.O.I & Ors on 11 April, 2014
15. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, having
gone through the record with their valuable help and after
considering the entire matter, the main OA is disposed of with
the direction to the applicant to file a copy of the
representation (Annexure A-1) within a period of 2 weeks from
the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Thereafter, the
competent authority is directed to decide the
representation/entitlement of the applicant for compassionate
allowance & compensation pension in terms of Rule 41 of
CCS(Pension) Rules, ratio of law laid down in Mahinder Dutt
Sharma's case (supra) and in accordance with law, by
passing a speaking order, within a period of 2 months
positively. However, the parties are left to bear their own
costs.
Shri Daya Nand Kaushik vs Union Of India & Ors. Through on 15 February, 2010
5.7 That the applicant is in distress due to death of her husband and
unable to maintain herself and it is incumbent upon the authority needs to
considered the present socio economic condition of the applicant while
deciding the case of husband of applicant for compassionate allowance
under Rule 41 of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 & compensation pension.
5.8 That it is incumbent t upon the authority to ignore the gravity of
allegation on which basis extreme punishment imposed upon deceased
husband of applicant and the gravity of allegation cannot be criteria to
deny the husband of applicant the compassionate allowance as per Rule
41 of CCS (Pension) (sic) Rules & compassionate pension.
5.9 That it is pertinent to mention that husband of the applicant has
rendered a clean service record except the present one.
5.10 That the applicant is placing its reliance on the judgment of
Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Ex. Const. Daya Nand Vs. Union of
India & Others (copy annexed).
1