Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 26 (2.42 seconds)

Premlata Digambar Rao Deo vs Principal, St. Philomine'S Convent ... on 4 November, 1996

18. I, therefore, in the facts and circumstances of this petition and the provisions of the Payment of Gratuity Act, hold and declare that the definition of "employee", Section 2(e) of the Payment of Gratuity Act includes and covers in its compass the class of teachers employed in an establishment of a school and are therefore entitled to the benefits of payment of gratuity in accordance with provisions of the Act. Moreover, I am bound by the judgment of our Division Bench in the case of Premlata (supra) which is directly governing the point in this petition.
Bombay High Court Cites 40 - Cited by 2 - S S Nijjar - Full Document
1   2 3 Next