Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.19 seconds)Section 406 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Smt. Rashmi Kumar vs Mahesh Kumar Bhada on 18 December, 1996
7. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners / accused submitted that there is no evidence to show that the gold ornaments were handed over by Thangaveni to K.Velayutham (A2), V.Geetha (A3) and S.Uma Sundaram (A4). He also placed reliance on Section 181(4) Cr.PC and contended that even according to the prosecution, the gold ornaments were entrusted in Susindram, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District and therefore, the prosecution is not maintainable in the Court of the Judicial Magistrate, Ambattur. He also relied upon the judgment of Supreme Court in Rashmi Kumar (SMT) Vs Mahesh Kumar Bhada, [(1997) 2 SCC 397].
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 207 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 220 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
1