Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.18 seconds)Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Hindustan Shipyard Ltd. & Ors vs Dr. P. Sambasiva Rao Etc on 30 January, 1996
16. Thus, on the basis of above deliberations, and specifically
taking into consideration the law laid down in the case of Uma Devi
(supra) and Hindustan Shipyard (supra) and also subsequent to
dealing with the scope and range of Circular dated 10.09.2010 as well
as of the case Mahanadi Coalfields (supra), this Tribunal is of the
considered opinion that the instant case of the applicants holds no
merit. The applicants were engaged on contractual basis and at this
stage, claim for regularization cannot be allowed to them simply on
the strength of the service they have rendered on contractual basis
and also taking into consideration the fact that no advertisement was
issued by the respondents to recruit fresh appointees on the post of
Gateman. The instant OA is liable to be dismissed and the same is
accordingly dismissed, being devoid of merits at this stage itself.
Secretary, State Of Karnataka And ... vs Umadevi And Others on 10 April, 2006
16. Thus, on the basis of above deliberations, and specifically
taking into consideration the law laid down in the case of Uma Devi
(supra) and Hindustan Shipyard (supra) and also subsequent to
dealing with the scope and range of Circular dated 10.09.2010 as well
as of the case Mahanadi Coalfields (supra), this Tribunal is of the
considered opinion that the instant case of the applicants holds no
merit. The applicants were engaged on contractual basis and at this
stage, claim for regularization cannot be allowed to them simply on
the strength of the service they have rendered on contractual basis
and also taking into consideration the fact that no advertisement was
issued by the respondents to recruit fresh appointees on the post of
Gateman. The instant OA is liable to be dismissed and the same is
accordingly dismissed, being devoid of merits at this stage itself.
Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. vs Brajrajnagar Coal Mines Workers Union on 21 February, 2022
16. Thus, on the basis of above deliberations, and specifically
taking into consideration the law laid down in the case of Uma Devi
(supra) and Hindustan Shipyard (supra) and also subsequent to
dealing with the scope and range of Circular dated 10.09.2010 as well
as of the case Mahanadi Coalfields (supra), this Tribunal is of the
considered opinion that the instant case of the applicants holds no
merit. The applicants were engaged on contractual basis and at this
stage, claim for regularization cannot be allowed to them simply on
the strength of the service they have rendered on contractual basis
and also taking into consideration the fact that no advertisement was
issued by the respondents to recruit fresh appointees on the post of
Gateman. The instant OA is liable to be dismissed and the same is
accordingly dismissed, being devoid of merits at this stage itself.
1