Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 21 (0.26 seconds)

State Of Punjab vs Hira Lal And Ors. on 18 December, 1970

10. Ld. APP for the State assisted by Ld. counsel for the complainant firstly has submitted the facts of the present case in detail. It is argued that on 23.03.2007, the accused executed the various documents in presence of the witnesses, relating to transfer of the property in favour of complainant and receipt of sale consideration, placed on record as Ex.PW1/A1 to Ex.PW1/A7, however they did not had the intention to honor the agreement entered between the parties since the very inception. That acknowledging their consent to the said transaction, sons of accused Hira Lal namely Sunder and Om Prakash, co­accused in the present case had also signed these documents and they were also witnessed by PW­3 Krishan and PW­4 Maan Singh, who supported the case of the prosecution in the court. That on 07.04.07 accused State Vs. Hira Lal etc. Case No.2031645/16 4/18 Sunder Singh had given another NOC Ex.PW1/A8 to the complainant regarding his consent in selling of the property and confirming receipt of his share of money. Again that on 27.08.07, the accused Hira Lal has given Receipt and possession letter Ex.PW1/A9 stating there in that he has already given possession of one room to the complainant and had undertaken to give possession of remaining property in 3 months after marriage of his daughter. Thereafter the accused avoided the handing over the possession of remaining property to the complainant on one pretext or another and finally a Panchayat happened on 01.12.2009 at the house of accused persons, in presence of 10­15 villagers, there a compromise i.e. Panchayatnama Ex.PW1/B1 was entered between the parties and sale consideration was increased to Rs. 35 Lacs from 20 Lacs and the accused handed over the possession of one more room and the photographs of the house were taken while handing over the possession. That said photographs are Ex.PW1/ D1 & D2. It is further submitted that said panchayatnama Ex.PW1/B1 was written by accused Sunder Singh and in this regard reliance is placed upon FSL report dated 09.10.2012 filed along with supplementary charge sheet. That PW­4 Maan Singh has proved the panchyat happened on 01.12.2009 and identified his signature on panchayatnama at point Q5.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 116 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next