Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.21 seconds)
Dr. Shivam Chugh vs National Board Of Examinations & Ors. on 15 October, 2019 cites

Dar-Us-Slam Educational Trust vs Medical Council Of India on 8 May, 2017

"69. As far as the third contention is concerned, this Court in Ashish Ranjan v. Union of India has dealt with this issue and come [sic: came] to the conclusion that the order in Dar-Us-Slam case is not applicable to postgraduate courses and is applicable only to undergraduate courses. This Court rejected the contention that the order in Dar-Us-Slam or the letter of the Union of India dated 26-5-2017 are applicable to postgraduate courses. ..."
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 73 - Full Document

Association Of Private Medical And ... vs The State Of Chhattisgarh on 9 June, 2017

5.5 The Supreme Court has clarified both in Ashish Ranjan vs. Union of India, W.P. (C) No. 76 of 2016 and in Association of Private Medical & Dental Colleges of Chhattisgarh vs. State of Chhattisgarh, 2017 (8) SCC 627 that the directions contained in Dar-Us-Slam Educational Trust would W.P. (C) No. 6796/2019 Page 9 of 23 apply only to the undergraduate courses and not to the postgraduate courses. Therefore, this objection of the NBE is without merit and, hence, unsustainable.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 9 - D Gupta - Full Document

Ashish Ranjan vs Union Of India . on 18 January, 2016

"69. As far as the third contention is concerned, this Court in Ashish Ranjan v. Union of India has dealt with this issue and come [sic: came] to the conclusion that the order in Dar-Us-Slam case is not applicable to postgraduate courses and is applicable only to undergraduate courses. This Court rejected the contention that the order in Dar-Us-Slam or the letter of the Union of India dated 26-5-2017 are applicable to postgraduate courses. ..."
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 102 - Full Document

Dr. Vinayak Varma vs Medical Counselling Committee on 28 November, 2018

16. The Supreme Court, when faced with such like situation, has issued the directions for admitting the candidates. There are three judgments which immediately come to mind viz. Dr. Vinayak Varma vs. Medical Counselling Committee & Ors., 2018 SCC OnLine SC 3113; UPSC v. Gyan Prakash Srivastava, (2012) 1 SCC 5371; and Dolly Chhanda vs. Chairman, Jee and Others, (2005) 9 SCC 7792.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 4 - Cited by 9 - Full Document

Dolly Chhanda vs Chairman, Jee & Ors on 5 October, 2004

16. The Supreme Court, when faced with such like situation, has issued the directions for admitting the candidates. There are three judgments which immediately come to mind viz. Dr. Vinayak Varma vs. Medical Counselling Committee & Ors., 2018 SCC OnLine SC 3113; UPSC v. Gyan Prakash Srivastava, (2012) 1 SCC 5371; and Dolly Chhanda vs. Chairman, Jee and Others, (2005) 9 SCC 7792.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 362 - Full Document

Ashish Tathagat Gilhare vs State Of Chhattisgarh 33 Wps/5414/2018 ... on 23 August, 2018

11. It is important to note that the very same Bench, in a subsequent order issued in Ashish Ranjan's case clarified that the directions contained in Dar-Us-Slam Educational Trust did not apply to postgraduate courses. This fact was noticed by the Supreme Court in Association of Private Medical & Dental Colleges of Chhattisgarh. The relevant observations are extracted hereafter: -
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 5 - P S Koshy - Full Document
1