Union Of India Thur. The Secy. Ministry ... vs Central Administrative Tribunal, Lko. ... on 17 June, 2010
10. From these judgements, it is made clear that, when Government
decided to obtain the views of the TNPSC, it is necessary that, copy of the
views must be supplied in advance to the delinquent concerned to give an
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
________
Page 8 of 10
W.P.No.11481 of 2011
opportunity to differ the views. It is not in dispute that, such an opportunity
was not given to the petitioner. Therefore, in the light of the legal
proposition settled in Union of India, Ministry of Defence and another
Vs. The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai and
another reported in (2005) 2 MLJ 154, this Court finds that imposition of
punishment to the petitioner without serving the copy of the views of
TNPSC is not appropriate and in accordance with law. Therefore,
punishment imposed against the petitioner of reduction in rank with
cumulative effect is set aside.