Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.32 seconds)Anurag Sahai vs D.D.A. on 22 November, 2012
24. Having thus recorded submissions of learned
counsel, as well as submissions advanced in the
pleadings, I am of the view that the case of the petitioner
W.P.(C) 1124/2014 Page 8 of 14
is bound to succeed, in view of the judgments of this
Court in Anurag Sahai (supra) and of the Supreme Court
in V. N. Bharat (supra), on which Mr. Saini rightly
relies.
Naresh Kumar Kataria vs Delhi Development Authority on 17 May, 2012
(vii) Naresh Kumar Kataria v. D.D.A., 2012 SCC OnLine
Del 2889,
State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Bhailal Bhai & Ors on 20 January, 1964
(ix) State of Madhya Pradesh v. Bhailal Bhai, AIR 1964
SC 1006,
Municipal Council, Ahmednagar And Anr vs Shah Hyder Beig And Ors on 8 December, 1999
(x) Municipal Council Ahmednagar & Ors. v. Shah
Hyder Beig, AIR 2000 SC 671.
Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sharma vs Delhi Development Authority on 9 February, 2005
(iv) Sudhir Kumar Sharma v. D.D.A, 2005 SCC OnLine
Del 149,
V.N. Bharat vs D.D.A. & Anr on 2 September, 2008
24. Having thus recorded submissions of learned
counsel, as well as submissions advanced in the
pleadings, I am of the view that the case of the petitioner
W.P.(C) 1124/2014 Page 8 of 14
is bound to succeed, in view of the judgments of this
Court in Anurag Sahai (supra) and of the Supreme Court
in V. N. Bharat (supra), on which Mr. Saini rightly
relies.
Mohinder Singh vs Delhi Development Authority on 19 May, 2011
11. In this case, at the time of registration under
the New Pattern Registration Scheme, 1979, the
petitioner had not informed DDA with regard to his
occupational address, however, an income
certificate from his employer was placed on record,
on the letter head of the employer where the
address was mentioned. The petitioner continued to
work with the same business establishment and in
case the demand-cum-allotment letter was issued to
the petitioner at his occupational address there is
every likelihood that he would have received the
same. Accordingly, the present case is fully
covered by the decision rendered by the Court in
the case of Mohinder Singh v. DDA (supra) which
has been upheld by the Division Bench.
Sheelawanti And Anr., ... vs Delhi Development Authority And Anr. on 3 February, 1995
23. Mr. Saini further places reliance on the judgment
dated 16th February, 2012 of a coordinate Bench of this
Court in Ravi Dass v. DDA, 2012 SCC Online Del 987
and of the judgment of the Supreme Court in V. N.
Bharat v. DDA, (2008) 17 SCC 321.
Sushila Pareek vs Delhi Development Authority on 22 May, 2015
(i) Sushila Pareek v. DDA, 2015 SCC OnLine Del 9739,